When must MAJCOMs provide guidance for Simulated Flameout (SFO)/Emergency Landing Pattern (ELP)?

The correct choice emphasizes the situation where the aircraft technical orders (T.O.s) do not provide specific guidance regarding Simulated Flameout (SFO) or Emergency Landing Pattern (ELP) scenarios. In such instances, it becomes essential for Major Commands (MAJCOMs) to step in and provide clear protocols or guidance to ensure the safety and effectiveness of operations that could be complicated by the lack of detailed instructions from the T.O.s. This ensures that pilots can manage simulated flameouts or emergency landings safely and effectively, even when standard references do not address the necessary procedures.

In contrast, the other scenarios listed do not necessarily create a requirement for MAJCOM guidance in the same way. For example, while emergency procedures being established is important, they do not specifically trigger the need for additional guidance unless there is a gap in the existing protocols. Similarly, flying in adverse weather conditions, while it might require additional precautions, does not directly mean that MAJCOMs must provide guidance specifically for SFO or ELP procedures. Conducting routine maintenance generally falls under established maintenance practices and does not typically necessitate MAJCOM intervention regarding emergency landing procedures.